Prepared to Teach Online? Perspectives of Faculty in the University of North Carolina System
Lysa Kosak
Dionna Manning
Ellen Dobson
Lisa Rogerson
Shannon Cotnam
Susan Colaric
Cheryl Mcfadden
Abstract
The prevalence of online distance education courses requires university faculty to face new challenges and make new decisions in the areas of course management and design, delivery method, student communication media, creation of an engaging learning environment, assessment , and use of new technologies. The purpose of this study was to ascertain if university faculty in the University of North Carolina System are receiving sufficient training and support in developing an online distance education curriculum. There was also an interest in the types and amount of training the faculty received at various institutions as well as their attitudes toward developing curriculum for online learning. An online survey was employed to solicit data from faculty of the schools and departments of education (SCDEs) within the University of North Carolina System who have previously taught online courses. The survey addressed the experience of respondents, types of on and off-campus training offered, topics offered in training, relevancy of offerings, whether or not training was required prior to course delivery, and requested ideas for staff development that were desired but unavailable. The majority of respondents indicated that there was sufficient training for faculty to support the change to online learning. Respondents also indicated that most training was offered on-campus, was predominately related to pedagogical and technical areas, was viewed as relevant and accessible, and participation was voluntary or not required. Faculty attitudes, according to results, were overall positive about the quality and quantity of training for course development and maintenance for online learning environments.
Keywords
Faculty, Online teaching, Preparedness
Annotation
The purpose of this study was to discern if university faculty were receiving sufficient training and support in developing an online curriculum. There was also interest in the types and amount of training the faculty received at various institutions as well as their attitudes towards developing curriculum for online learning. Finally, the timeliness of available training was of interest.
About the Study
| Links to Article | |
| Mode | |
| Publication Type | Journal Article |
| In Publication | |
| Type of Research | |
| Research Design | |
| Intervention/Areas of Study | |
| Level of Analysis | |
| Specific Populations Examined | |
| Peer-Reviewed | |
| Specific Institutional Characteristics of Interest | |
| Specific Course or Program Characteristics | |
| Outcome Variables of Interest | |
| Student Sample Size | |
| Citing Articles |
Back to Annotation Database
